From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24828 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2002 04:55:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24792 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2002 04:55:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Apr 2002 04:55:56 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA17397; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 08:54:03 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 21:55:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: chanskw@ca.ibm.com cc: Andrew Cagney , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Questions about GDB-MI Interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00430.txt.bz2 On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 chanskw@ca.ibm.com wrote: > in mi/mi-main.c, where the CLI command forwarding is done, that says >=20 > /*=A0A=A0CLI=A0command=A0was=A0read=A0from=A0the=A0input=A0stream=A0= */ > /*=A0This=A0will=A0be=A0removed=A0as=A0soon=A0as=A0we=A0have=A0a=A0c= omplete=A0set=A0of > =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0mi=A0commands=A0*/ >=20 > Before we decide to go down the path of switching to MI, we need to confi= rm > that CLI-in-MI capability will continue to be available for us to provide= a > console window for our users. I second that. If this is removed, I think GDB/MI should introduce an=20 alternative feature with equivalent functionality, like some special=20 command that will allow a CLI command to be fed to MI.