From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13518 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2002 07:40:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13509 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2002 07:40:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Apr 2002 07:40:21 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA15775; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 11:38:55 +0300 (IDT) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 00:40:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: Doug Evans cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: does bpstat_print stop printing prematurely? In-Reply-To: <15547.51222.125386.852824@casey.transmeta.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00261.txt.bz2 On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Doug Evans wrote: > Now, if the gdb maintainers want to make the bug go away by defining > it away that's their prerogative. It's a step backwards though. I didn't say that the problem didn't exist, just that I didn't see it and couldn't reproduce it with a small test I tried. Thanks for the example, I will look into it.