From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-8093-listarch-gdb=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 27869 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2002 05:58:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 27783 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2002 05:58:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Mar 2002 05:58:28 -0000
Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2])
	by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id HAA15294;
	Tue, 19 Mar 2002 07:56:46 +0200 (IST)
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 21:58:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Sender: eliz@is
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: @example vs @smallexample?
In-Reply-To: <3C964EE3.1080100@cygnus.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020319075501.15195B@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00174.txt.bz2


On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote:

> > I wonder whether we should add a comment in the manual saying that
> > only @smallexample should be used.
> 
> In a (er @chapter :-)

We could make it an @appendix.

> that documents the conventions used by the manual? 

Yes, that sounds like a good place.  Perhaps as a footnote (since it's a 
minor matter for someone who reads the text, not writes new content).