From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27180 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2002 06:13:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27098 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2002 06:13:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Mar 2002 06:13:06 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA08348; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 08:12:07 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 22:13:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: Daniel Jacobowitz cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: New directory src/gdb/misc? In-Reply-To: <20020307003134.B20240@nevyn.them.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00035.txt.bz2 On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > This leaves ``gdb/common'' and, (new suggestion) gdb/misc/ as possible > > directory names. > > 'misc' doesn't convey any information. It's like calling something > 'new' in its documentation - not useful for very long. I'd vote for > common. Either `common' or maybe `lib' (or `gdblib'). I agree that `misc' is not such a good idea.