From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-7483-listarch-gdb=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 16088 invoked by alias); 24 Jan 2002 17:09:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 16054 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2002 17:09:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Jan 2002 17:09:45 -0000
Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2])
	by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id TAA21167;
	Thu, 24 Jan 2002 19:08:58 +0200 (IST)
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 09:09:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Sender: eliz@is
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfc] maint note on obsoleting code
In-Reply-To: <3C503D67.7080702@cygnus.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020124190727.21049C-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00286.txt.bz2


On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote:

> @emph{Maintainer note: Obsoleting a target or code is actually a good
> thing.

Aren't we supposed to be mightily sad when some target becomes obsolete?  
They mostly do because no one wants to maintain them anymore, a user who 
cannot afford hacking GDB will not be pleased...