From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27430 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2002 07:43:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27397 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2002 07:43:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Jan 2002 07:43:13 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA23455; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 09:41:48 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 23:43:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain cc: sassi@uni.de, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB C++ support In-Reply-To: <200201141840.MAA00739@duracef.shout.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00151.txt.bz2 On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > So try gdb 5.1. It works much better with gcc 3 versions. Do you (or someone else) happen to know whether v5.1 solves some or all of the specific problems Guido described in his message? If not, he has no reason to try GDB 5.1, does he? I've seen too many messages here which describe problems GDB 5.1 has debugging C++ code, and I know too little about these problems to tell whether they are relevant to Guido's case. That's why I suggested him to write here, hoping that someone could provide a more specific answer.