From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4987 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2001 07:41:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4955 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2001 07:41:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by hostedprojects.ges.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Nov 2001 07:41:30 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA20585; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 09:41:03 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 09:42:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: Andrew Cagney cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: 5.1 ERRATA file? In-Reply-To: <3C033A28.50209@cygnus.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00171.txt.bz2 On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Something I noticed from the feedback so far is that it is hard to know > what problems a release will have - they are burried in the file > gdb/README. What do people think of them being moved to the file > gdb/ERRATA? I suggest gdb/PROBLEMS or even (gasp) gdb/BUGS. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eli Zaretskii To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: 5.1 ERRATA file? Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 23:41:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <3C033A28.50209@cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-11/msg00278.html Message-ID: <20011126234100.yHmA_ZNj8qNMyVfFLsdkniyOFbzphTytKHDiGElTvAM@z> On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Something I noticed from the feedback so far is that it is hard to know > what problems a release will have - they are burried in the file > gdb/README. What do people think of them being moved to the file > gdb/ERRATA? I suggest gdb/PROBLEMS or even (gasp) gdb/BUGS.