From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6081 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2001 09:49:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6021 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2001 09:49:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by sourceware.cygnus.com with SMTP; 12 Nov 2001 09:49:43 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA13031 for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2001 11:49:27 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 11:21:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: gdb Subject: Re: gdb.ini vs. .gdbinit on Cygwin In-Reply-To: <20011111205316.R2138@cygbert.vinschen.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2 On Sun, 11 Nov 2001, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > is there still a reason why the .gdbinit file is called gdb.ini > on Cygwin? You might consider the fact that the Windows Explorer still disallows creation of files with a leading dot. I don't know if this is important for Cygwin users, though. Also, if you remove gdb.ini, I'd suggest to have a transitional period where gdb.ini is still supported. Otherwise, users might get mad at you for breaking their setup. In any case, please change the docs accordingly (type "i gdb.ini RET" in an Info reader, to find where it is mentioned).