From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: GDB Discussion <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: 5.1 README
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 08:01:00 -0000
Message-id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010725180001.18012E-100000@is>
References: <3B5C8F95.9020900@cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-07/msg00360.html

On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Andrew Cagney wrote:

> >> o	it doesn't mention building PDF
> > 
> > This can be easily added.  Should I do that?
> 
> Yes please.

Done.

> > P.S.  Somebody should make sure the PDF version indeed can be built with 
> > the popular version(s) of PDFTeX, before we advertise that.
> 
> 
> Oh, great :-)  How many are there?  Looks like all the machines I have 
> access to have teTeX (of one varity or another) installed.

I think this is enough, especially since we've decided to require
Texinfo 4.0.

(Personally, I like DviPDFm better than PDFTeX, since production of DVI 
files is normally less prone to problems, and DviPDFm has never failed to 
produce a PDF file from a valid DVI.)