From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eli Zaretskii To: Andrew Cagney Cc: GDB Discussion Subject: Re: 5.1 README Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 09:38:00 -0000 Message-id: References: <3B572CA1.6050203@cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-07/msg00320.html On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Several things I've noticed: > > o it recommends a separate build tree > yet gives the same build tree example > first IIRC, this was discussed in the past, and we decided to leave it as it is now. I don't see anything wrong with the current structure: after all, for a typical user, keeping the source directory pristine is not very important. Those who care will read the recommendation and act upon it. > o it doesn't mention building PDF This can be easily added. Should I do that? P.S. Somebody should make sure the PDF version indeed can be built with the popular version(s) of PDFTeX, before we advertise that.