From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: GDB Discussion <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [mi] Revised breakpoint table output
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 01:49:00 -0000
Message-id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010612115011.1700P-100000@is>
References: <3B25333E.4050409@cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-06/msg00089.html

On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Andrew Cagney wrote:

> Following on the revisions to the MI output, the breakpoint table, under 
> the list/tuple schema ends up looking like:
> 
> 201-break-list
> 201^done,BreakpointTable={hdr=[{width="3",alignment="-1",colname="number",colhdr
> ="Num"},{width="14",alignment="-1",colname="type",colhdr="Type"},{width="4",alig
> nment="-1",colname="disp",colhdr="Disp"},{width="3",alignment="-1",colname="enab
> led",colhdr="Enb"},{width="10",alignment="-1",colname="addr",colhdr="Address"},{
> width="40",alignment="2",colname="what",colhdr="What"}],body=[]}

Sorry for being a nag, but please remember to update the relevant
parts of gdbmi.texinfo.  It shows the format and actual examples of
output for many commands.