From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
To: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Mingw-users] Re: _WIN32?
Date: Sat, 05 May 2001 23:03:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010506090458.4974B-100000@is> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010505215249.A6163@redhat.com>
On Sat, 5 May 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> If I were you, I would encapsulate everything as much as possible.
> Rather than make changes to 27 different gdb functions, create
> compatibility functions and put them in win32-nat.c, controlled by a
> defined (_WIN32) && !defined (__CYGWIN__) conditional.
It can also make sense to put this in libiberty, although that would
complicate the patch acceptance. However, gettimeofday is a very
important function, and if MinGW indeed lacks it, its implementation
shouldn't be private to GDB, IMHO.
> We were talking about the fact that there may be places in gdb which
> are currently under _WIN32 control which should actually be under something
> like FILESYSTEM_USES_COLON control, or something like that. Those are
> the things that should be set in configure.host, IMO.
I suggest to use the macros from include/filenames.h as much as
possible. They are used in Binutils and elsewhere in GDB, so there
shouldbe no need to reinvent them.
I will shortly submit a patch that switches some of the #ifdef's to
use filenames.h.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-05 23:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-05 15:57 Danny Smith
2001-05-05 18:54 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-05-05 23:03 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2001-05-05 23:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-05-06 1:52 ` Danny Smith
[not found] <200105010009.RAA12115@tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
2001-05-03 1:24 ` Paul Hilfinger
2001-05-03 13:41 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-05-03 14:15 ` Danny Smith
2001-05-03 15:24 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-05-03 15:54 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-05-03 16:11 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-05-04 2:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-05-04 2:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-05-04 8:45 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-05-04 10:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-05-04 12:04 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-05-07 9:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-05-03 23:58 ` Paul Hilfinger
2001-05-04 9:04 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-05-04 0:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-04-30 10:15 _WIN32? Christopher Faylor
2001-04-30 16:19 ` [Mingw-users] _WIN32? Danny Smith
2001-04-30 17:03 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-04-30 17:29 ` Danny Smith
2001-05-01 7:03 ` Kai Ruottu
2001-05-01 7:44 ` Christopher Faylor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.SUN.3.91.1010506090458.4974B-100000@is \
--to=eliz@is.elta.co.il \
--cc=cgf@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox