From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
To: Jacques-Olivier Goussard <jgoussard@nuance.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: RE: Helping GDB to find symbols
Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 01:44:00 -0000
Message-id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010501114517.29799A-100000@is>
References: <NEBBKPBKLKFJPDFPMBDICEPPCBAA.jgoussard@nuance.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-05/msg00000.html

On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Jacques-Olivier Goussard wrote:

> > Doesn't it work to say "gdb yourprog core", where `yourprog' is the 
> > unstripped binary and `core' is the core file you get from your 
> > customers?
> No. I guess it gets mixed up in the addresses and offsets. The stacktrace
> for example is quite different when I switched to the non-debug to
> debug binaries (exec and dynamic libraries).

Hmm?  I don't understand how is this possible: all the addresses in a
stripped program should be exactly like in an unstripped one.
Otherwise, you won't be able to debug the core dump which originated
from an unstripped program.

Am I missing something?

What is your object file format and debug info format, btw?