From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
To: "J.T. Conklin" <jtc@redback.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: make capabilities
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 15:59:00 -0000
Message-id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010304080237.12520B@is>
References: <5mofvlqrpv.fsf@jtc.redback.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-03/msg00012.html

On 1 Mar 2001, J.T. Conklin wrote:

> Is it safe to assume that all versions of make used to build GDB will
> understand the ${FOO:.c=.o} construct?  It does not appear to be used
> elsewhere in the GDB or binutils trees, so it is possible (maybe even
> likely) that they do not.  But I do not know how to solve a problem
> without it.
> 
> The problem is the "lint" target:
> 
>         lint:   $(LINTFILES)
>                 $(LINT) $(INCLUDE_CFLAGS) $(LINTFLAGS) $(LINTFILES) \
>                    `echo $(DEPFILES) | sed 's/\.o /\.c /g'`
> 
> If srcdir != objdir, lint is not able to find the source files.  This
> can be fixed if the rule is re-written as such:
> 
>         lint:   $(LINTFILES) $(DEPFILES:.c=.o)
>                 $(LINT) $(INCLUDE_CFLAGS) $(LINTFLAGS) $^
> 
> Thoughts?

I can suggest two thoughts:

  1. The current Emacs distribution uses $(FOO:.x=.y) in its Makefile's.  
     While this version is not yet released, its pretest was tested on 
     many different systems, and none failed to build it.

  2. However, it _is_ known that not all versions of Make support that 
     construct.  If you want to be 100% portable, you can edit .c into .o 
     with `sed` invocation in the rule's commands.