From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: Nick Duffek <nsd@redhat.com>,
insight@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com,
fnasser@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Register group proposal
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 00:59:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010222105511.1660T-100000@is> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3A942228.C9E05495@cygnus.com>
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> I guess this is called as something like (I'll take the liberty of using
> slightly different names):
>
> for (regnum = REGGROUP_FIRST_REGNUM (reggroup);
> regnum >= 0;
> retnum = REGGROUP_NEXT_REGNUM (reggroup, regnum))
> {
> apply regnum;
> }
If we are to use an iterator, shouldn't the test in this loop be
abstracted as well, like this, for instance?
for (regnum = REGGROUP_FIRST_REGNUM (reggroup);
REGGROUP_NOT_LAST_REGNUM (reggroup);
regnum = REGGROUP_NEXT_REGNUM (reggroup, regnum))
{
apply regnum;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-22 0:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-20 20:56 Nick Duffek
2001-02-21 6:44 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-02-21 7:10 ` Nick Duffek
2001-02-21 7:36 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-02-21 7:58 ` Keith Seitz
2001-02-21 8:50 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-02-21 11:43 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-02-25 15:36 ` Nick Duffek
2001-02-21 11:43 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-02-21 12:28 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-02-21 12:18 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-02-22 0:59 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
[not found] ` <200102221237.f1MCbtX02766@rtl.cygnus.com>
2001-02-22 8:46 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-02-22 8:56 ` Keith Seitz
2001-02-22 9:20 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-02-22 5:17 ` Nick Duffek
2001-02-22 6:36 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-02-22 8:23 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-02-22 7:58 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-02-22 8:37 ` Nick Duffek
2001-02-22 9:12 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-02-22 10:15 ` Nick Duffek
2001-02-22 10:25 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-02-22 11:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2001-02-22 11:02 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-02-22 12:08 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-02-22 8:16 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-02-21 3:00 Stephane Carrez
2001-02-21 7:00 ` Nick Duffek
2001-02-21 9:34 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-02-22 9:19 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2001-02-23 2:52 Bernard Dautrevaux
2001-02-24 15:43 ` Nick Duffek
2001-02-26 18:21 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-02-27 10:30 ` Jim Kleck
2001-02-27 11:24 ` Per Bothner
2001-02-27 13:44 ` Jim Kleck
2001-02-27 15:17 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-02-26 5:29 Bernard Dautrevaux
2001-02-26 9:28 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-02-26 10:56 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-02-26 11:28 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-02-26 17:02 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-02-27 8:53 ` Christopher Faylor
2001-02-27 9:57 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-02-28 1:59 Bernard Dautrevaux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.SUN.3.91.1010222105511.1660T-100000@is \
--to=eliz@is.elta.co.il \
--cc=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=fnasser@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=insight@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=nsd@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox