From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Kosnik To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Jason Merrill , libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: C++ debugging progress Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 12:50:00 -0000 Message-id: References: <20011129152709.A9719@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2001-11/msg00343.html I'd like to give this work a spin when it gets in. Jason, I see that you've not posted to gcc-patches with this: can you let me know when it's in mainline gcc? I figure it's pretty pointless to try this without the gdb bits. Daniel, same with you, except gdb-patches. thanks again to both of you, benjamin > To be honest, I'd rather the patch go in anyway. C++ debugging for v3 > is so broken in gdb 5.1 that it does not make a lot of sense to cater > to it. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10792 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2001 20:50:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10060 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2001 20:49:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5) by hostedprojects.ges.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Nov 2001 20:49:14 -0000 Received: from taarna.cygnus.com (taarna.cygnus.com [205.180.230.102]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA00868; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 12:49:03 -0800 (PST) Received: (bkoz@localhost) by taarna.cygnus.com (SMI-8.6/8.6.4) id MAA16670; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 12:49:02 -0800 Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 08:40:00 -0000 From: Benjamin Kosnik X-Sender: bkoz@taarna.cygnus.com To: Daniel Jacobowitz cc: Jason Merrill , libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: C++ debugging progress In-Reply-To: <20011129152709.A9719@nevyn.them.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00236.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20011125084000.gQ2xPYP2jeg0ZZwF-vdly3rWM0dmWO4k8muAX8W0Yl0@z> I'd like to give this work a spin when it gets in. Jason, I see that you've not posted to gcc-patches with this: can you let me know when it's in mainline gcc? I figure it's pretty pointless to try this without the gdb bits. Daniel, same with you, except gdb-patches. thanks again to both of you, benjamin > To be honest, I'd rather the patch go in anyway. C++ debugging for v3 > is so broken in gdb 5.1 that it does not make a lot of sense to cater > to it.