From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24769 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2003 17:57:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24762 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2003 17:57:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO TheWorld.com) (199.172.62.105) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 30 Jan 2003 17:57:22 -0000 Received: from shell.TheWorld.com (root@shell01.TheWorld.com [199.172.62.241]) by TheWorld.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA21804; Thu, 30 Jan 2003 12:57:21 -0500 Received: from localhost (qqi@localhost) by shell.TheWorld.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA46999257; Thu, 30 Jan 2003 12:57:20 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: shell01.TheWorld.com: qqi owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 17:57:00 -0000 From: Quality Quorum To: Andrew Cagney cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , Subject: Re: GDB respin In-Reply-To: <3E394943.5080902@redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00522.txt.bz2 On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Andrew Cagney wrote: > In fact, if the console problem can be resolved, I think there is a very > strong incentive to quickly spin out a 5.4. Releases are multiplied like rabbits :). If we are going thorugh big releases anyway, it may seem cost effective to refactor gdb into C++, using the real thing would save a lot of time in the long run comparing with constant grappling with poor man's c++. > Andrew Thanks, Aleksey