From: Quality Quorum <qqi@theworld.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>,
"Sarnath K - CTD, Chennai." <k_sarnath@ctd.hcltech.com>,
<gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Thread Support for remote debugging
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 15:22:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.4.40.0201311815360.10971237-100000@shell01.TheWorld.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020131181217.B4883@nevyn.them.org>
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 12:40:34PM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote:
> > "Sarnath K - CTD, Chennai." wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > I have been browsing the mail archives for
> > > knowing the current state of thread support
> > > while doing remote debugging using GDB.
> > > Although a lot of discussions have happened,
> > > I am not able to find the current state of work
> > > in that area.
> >
> > By "knowing the current state of thread support",
> > do you mean finding out whether the remote target
> > supports thread debugging?
>
> No, he means "knowing whether GDB and GDB Server support doing remote
> debugging at all", as far as I can tell.
>
> We've covered this ground a couple times lately :) Someone promised to
> contribute thread support and dropped off the face of the earth. It's
> on my TODO list, but I don't anticipate getting to it any time soon.
> Etc.
If you are talking about me, I had it done more than one year ago:
http://world.std.com/~qqi, see section about gdb.
The problem is that (1) redhat never said 'yes we want it' so it is
sitll based on 4.18, (2) there are a few issues which could be
resolved one way or anotehr an readhat never said 'we want it this way'.
> Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
Thanks,
Aleksey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-31 23:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-21 1:11 Sarnath K - CTD, Chennai.
2002-01-21 6:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-01-21 7:10 ` Quality Quorum
2002-01-21 8:38 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-01-31 12:47 ` Michael Snyder
2002-01-31 15:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-01-31 15:22 ` Quality Quorum [this message]
2002-01-31 17:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-01-31 19:41 ` Quality Quorum
2002-01-31 19:29 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-01-31 19:44 ` Quality Quorum
2002-01-31 15:41 ` Michael Snyder
2002-01-31 17:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-01-31 17:21 ` Michael Snyder
2002-01-21 22:08 Sarnath K - CTD, Chennai.
2002-01-31 23:32 Korbel, Michal
2002-02-01 7:45 ` Dan Kegel
2002-02-01 8:13 Korbel, Michal
2002-02-01 8:27 ` Dan Kegel
2002-02-01 9:43 ` Quality Quorum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.SGI.4.40.0201311815360.10971237-100000@shell01.TheWorld.com \
--to=qqi@theworld.com \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=k_sarnath@ctd.hcltech.com \
--cc=msnyder@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox