From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Quality Quorum <qqi@world.std.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Who owns gdbserver?
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 07:41:00 -0000
Message-id: <Pine.SGI.4.21.0106281036540.19466-100000@world.std.com>
References: <3B3AB1DF.9020500@cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-06/msg00214.html

On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Andrew Cagney wrote:

> 
> > My current inclination is that, after we enumerate precisely what
> > interfaces are needed, we may need to break some of the nat and tdep
> > files up into smaller pieces, so that gdbserver can link in the parts
> > it really needs - and the parts it can reasonably include the support
> > code for.
> 
> 
> Sounds good in theory, there is a catch-22 though.  Doing any cleanup is 
> a lot easier with everything multi-arch.
> 
> I'm happy for, short term, there to be a slightly bloated GDBserver, if 
> it means that people concentrate more on getting things multi-arched.

IMHO, the only thing truly shared between gdbserver and gdb
is register map - so it seems feasible to me to keep gdbserver
as an entity completely separate from gdb. 

> 
> 	Andrew
> 

Thanks,

Aleksey