From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23464 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2013 23:08:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 23441 invoked by uid 89); 14 Oct 2013 23:08:51 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 23:08:50 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1VVrFm-0003KS-Gl from joseph_myers@mentor.com ; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 16:08:46 -0700 Received: from SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([137.202.0.104]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 14 Oct 2013 16:08:46 -0700 Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.247.3; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 00:08:44 +0100 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1VVrFj-0005Sm-2d; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 23:08:43 +0000 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 23:08:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: Tom Tromey CC: Binutils Development , GDB Development Subject: Re: git conversion status In-Reply-To: <87wqlf21bt.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <871u3n3hxc.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87wqlf21bt.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-SW-Source: 2013-10/txt/msg00055.txt.bz2 On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, Tom Tromey wrote: > I chose it because the existing repository is named "src". > > I don't particularly care what the repository is named. > If folks want to debate it, I will rename it to the winner. > Time is running out for that though. My preference remains "binutils+gdb". Not "src", because this *isn't* the same as the existing repository - it's a more meaningful, more closely connected subset, without more loosely related things such as newlib mixed in (if newlib moves away from CVS, it would move to its own repository with whatever subset of directories is relevant to newlib, rather than sharing this one). -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com