From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-28755-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 29371 invoked by alias); 13 Jun 2007 20:24:40 -0000
Received: (qmail 29358 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jun 2007 20:24:39 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from de01egw01.freescale.net (HELO de01egw01.freescale.net) (192.88.165.102)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:24:32 +0000
Received: from de01smr01.freescale.net (de01smr01.freescale.net [10.208.0.31]) 	by de01egw01.freescale.net (8.12.11/de01egw01) with ESMTP id l5DKOQ44018762 	for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:24:26 -0700 (MST)
Received: from ld0159-tx32 (ld0159-tx32.am.freescale.net [10.82.19.109]) 	by de01smr01.freescale.net (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id l5DKOPdV016518 	for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:24:26 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:24:00 -0000
From: "Anmol P. Paralkar" <b07584@freescale.com>
To: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Keeping binutils/{bfd, opcodes} and gdb/{bfd, opcodes} in synch.
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706131513560.9640@ld0159-tx32.am.freescale.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00113.txt.bz2

Hello,

  What is the general methodology for keeping the gdb/{opcodes, bfd, ...} and
  binutils/{opcodes, bfd, ...} in synch with each other?  Is there some
  "synch policy" that GDB development follows? (I see quite a differential
  between these in gdb-6.6 and binutils-2.17).

Thanks,
Anmol.