From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10110 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2006 18:11:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 10081 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Dec 2006 18:11:32 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ns.suse.de (HELO mx1.suse.de) (195.135.220.2) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:11:23 +0000 Received: from Relay2.suse.de (mail2.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0989512241; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:11:21 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 18:11:00 -0000 From: Michael Matz To: Ulrich Drepper Cc: Andrew Haley , Mark Kettenis , Jan Kratochvil , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sourceware.org, Jakub Jelinek , Richard Henderson Subject: Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs In-Reply-To: <457ECD2F.9050700@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <20061211190300.GA4372@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <17790.46246.634400.638852@zebedee.pink> <22844.82.92.89.47.1165935102.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> <17790.50417.668957.495292@zebedee.pink> <457EC8BF.3040707@redhat.com> <17790.51754.814267.773596@zebedee.pink> <457ECD2F.9050700@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-12/txt/msg00118.txt.bz2 Hi, On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > > Really? Well, that's one interpretation. I don't believe that, > > though. It's certainly an inconsistency in the specification, which > > says that null-termination is supported, and this implies that you > > can't put a zero in there. > > Again, this is just because the "authors" of the ABI didn't think. [Blaeh, Ulrich talk] No, I think it's because the "readers" of the ABI can't read. Ciao, Michael.