From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15682 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2006 13:28:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 15670 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Oct 2006 13:28:53 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from pas38-1-82-67-71-117.fbx.proxad.net (HELO siegfried.gbfo.org) (82.67.71.117) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 13:28:45 +0000 Received: from erda.mds (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by siegfried.gbfo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k95DR12x013243; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 15:27:01 +0200 Received: from localhost (saffroy@localhost) by erda.mds (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) with ESMTP id k95DQxar013240; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 15:27:01 +0200 Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 13:28:00 -0000 From: Jean-Marc Saffroy To: Frederic RISS cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: gdb script performance In-Reply-To: <1160053117.13420.17.camel@crx549.cro.st.com> Message-ID: References: <1160053117.13420.17.camel@crx549.cro.st.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-10/txt/msg00024.txt.bz2 On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Frederic RISS wrote: > I haven't looked at your gprof results, but your problem is certainly > the same as described here: > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2006-08/msg00099.html Thanks for pointing this out! That's exactly the same problem indeed. > This discussion lead to the patch submitted here: > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2006-09/msg00088.html Great! The 12' script now runs in only 2'35". :-) I can't help thinking tt's still not blazingly fast, considering the underlying hardware, but it's a big step forward. > It hasn't been checked in yet because of missing copyright assignement > paperwork. Well I hope it will make it in the next gdb release. Thanks again! Cheers, -- saffroy@gmail.com