From: Wu Zhou <woodzltc@cn.ibm.com>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Some questions w.r.t remote watchpoint support in i386
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 12:54:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0604251813170.10220@woodzltc> (raw)
Hello all,
I am playing with remote debugging on i386 platform. At the very first, I
start gdbserver and gdb on two different i386 machines. In this configuration,
local gdb client can connect to remote gdb server. But after I set a
breakpoint and issue "cont" command, remote debuggee get a SIGV error.
Then I start gdbserver and gdb on the same machine. There is no such
error any more. And it seems that most gdb commands work ok. But I
encounter some problems with h/w watchpoint operations. I did some
search, and don't find much information about my problems. So I choose to
ask here:
1. The first error I encounter is: "Couldn't write debug register: No such
process".
After some tracking, I found gdb client is calling target_insert_watchpoint
defined in config/i386/nm-i386.h, instead of the remote_insert_watchpoint
defined in remote.c
I guess this is a more general problem. Whenever you change target under
i386 platform, you will always get the i386_insert_watchpoint (and other
three target operations) executed.
Maybe we can put these target operation into the target_ops, instead of
defining them as macro in config/i386/nm-i386.h?
Any comments on this thought? Thanks.
2. Following the above thought, I comment out these four macros in
config/i386/nm-i386.h, and add them into i386-linux-nat.c
This time, local gdb will call remote_insert_watchpoint indeed, but I get
another error:
Can't clear hardware watchpoints without the 'Z2' (write-watchpoint) packet.
"set debug remote 1" tell me that Packet Z2 (write-watchpoint) is NOT
supported
I tried to use "set remote write-watchpoint-packet 1", but it won't work
either:
Enabled packet Z2 (write-watchpoint) not recognized by stub
my question here is:
What is the stub refered to here? Is it the gdbserver? And how can
gdbserver determine which packat he will support, which won't?
As far as I understand, now that the underlying target support hardware
watchpoint, there is not any practical obstacle for gdbserver on i386 to
support this kind of packets. If I am wrong, please forgive me and
correct me. (I am no expert in this field anyway. :-)
3. I also have a question about the overall status of gdb's support for
remote debugging on different platforms.
The available documents (gdb manual, gdb internal) don't mention much
information about this. I had thought that all commands avaialbe in local
gdb will also work in remote mode. But the practice prove that I am
wrong. Playing with remote debugging always make me feel a little
frustrated. (I am not very sure what other feels. I guess embedded
people will feel more comfortable. :-)
Regards
- Wu Zhou
next reply other threads:[~2006-04-25 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-25 12:54 Wu Zhou [this message]
2006-04-25 19:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-05-22 16:39 ` Wu Zhou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0604251813170.10220@woodzltc \
--to=woodzltc@cn.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox