From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27456 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2005 03:46:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 27449 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Nov 2005 03:46:10 -0000 Received: from ausmtp02.au.ibm.com (HELO ausmtp02.au.ibm.com) (202.81.18.187) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 03:46:10 +0000 Received: from sd0208e0.au.ibm.com (d23rh904.au.ibm.com [202.81.18.202]) by ausmtp02.au.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jAI3e3Bt275690 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 14:40:03 +1100 Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (d23av04.au.ibm.com [9.190.250.237]) by sd0208e0.au.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.7) with ESMTP id jAI3n6KE133986 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 14:49:06 +1100 Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av04.au.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jAI3k4Vw011295 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 14:46:04 +1100 Received: from [9.181.133.252] ([9.181.133.252]) by d23av04.au.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jAI3k2JO011273; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 14:46:03 +1100 Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 03:46:00 -0000 From: Wu Zhou To: Daniel Jacobowitz cc: Joel Brobecker , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Maintainer policy for GDB In-Reply-To: <20051118033000.GA32482@nevyn.them.org> Message-ID: References: <20051117044801.GA4705@nevyn.them.org> <8f2776cb0511162240q6f550008udda9803b5253fd88@mail.gmail.com> <8f2776cb0511162244u5274377m70684a364a8a7edd@mail.gmail.com> <20051117140353.GA11432@nevyn.them.org> <20051117044801.GA4705@nevyn.them.org> <8f2776cb0511162240q6f550008udda9803b5253fd88@mail.gmail.com> <20051118030711.GB31581@nevyn.them.org> <20051118032644.GQ1635@adacore.com> <20051118033000.GA32482@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00372.txt.bz2 On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 07:26:44PM -0800, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > > > I think gdbint.texi should document what is implemented, and not what > > > > will be implemented. A Wiki seems to be a more appropriate place for > > > > roadmap items. They can be moved to gdbint.texi when they've been > > > > implemented. > > > > > > OK. No objection to referencing a Wiki (by nature a live document) > > > from MAINTAINERS? > > > > How about the website itself? Is a Wiki really better for that purpose? > > I think that a wiki is more useful for something intended to be > free-form and informal, describing the current state of GDB and > people's half-baked plans. The web site should be more polished. > > Just my two cents, though. I buy this idea. :-) IMHO, WiKi at least provides a open and collaborative platform for document work, which might be helpful for GDB. Regards - Wu Zhou