From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28993 invoked by alias); 6 Jun 2005 14:06:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28979 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jun 2005 14:06:01 -0000 Received: from ppsw-0.csi.cam.ac.uk (HELO ppsw-0.csi.cam.ac.uk) (131.111.8.130) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 14:06:01 +0000 Received: from hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.51]:45333) by ppsw-0.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.150]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:jv244) id 1DfIER-0003dh-0r (Exim 4.51) (return-path ); Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:05:35 +0100 Received: from jv244 (helo=localhost) by hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local-esmtp id 1DfIER-0001YS-6Q (Exim 4.43) (return-path ); Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:05:35 +0100 Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 14:06:00 -0000 From: Joost VandeVondele X-X-Sender: jv244@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk To: Daniel Jacobowitz cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb 6.3 segfault at stack.c:294 In-Reply-To: <20050606135852.GB27290@nevyn.them.org> Message-ID: References: <20050606135852.GB27290@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00049.txt.bz2 > On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 02:44:05PM +0100, Joost VandeVondele wrote: >> The executable is a fortran based one, compiled using NAG's f95 >> (which uses gcc to generate code AFAIK). > > GDB is not tested using this compiler; if it generates its own debug > information, it's probably in some way incompatible with GDB. > This could possibly be, I have no idea how it is (mis?)using gcc .. > > Presumably nsym is NULL. I can't imagine how that happened. > I think this is right : (gdb) print nsym $1 = (struct symbol *) 0x0