From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23724 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2005 21:59:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23707 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Jun 2005 21:58:59 -0000 Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com (HELO e33.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 21:58:58 +0000 Received: from westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.11]) by e33.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j5ALwumD136366 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 17:58:56 -0400 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (d03av03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.169]) by westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id j5ALwuQl232910 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:58:56 -0600 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5ALwtih009521 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:58:55 -0600 Received: from austin.ibm.com (netmail2.austin.ibm.com [9.41.248.176]) by d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5ALwtDW009515; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:58:55 -0600 Received: from lazy.austin.ibm.com (lazy.austin.ibm.com [9.53.94.97]) by austin.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j5ALwseQ132358; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:58:55 -0500 Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 21:59:00 -0000 From: Manoj Iyer X-X-Sender: manjo@lazy To: Mark Kettenis cc: cagney@gnu.org, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Orphans to adopt? In-Reply-To: <200506102136.j5ALaWXe018181@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Message-ID: References: <428A3FB7.8070008@apple.com> <200505172035.j4HKZ0oa028608@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <200505172121.j4HLLjsi002393@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <428CCFB5.5010308@gnu.org> <200506102136.j5ALaWXe018181@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00102.txt.bz2 > What would be immediatly helpful is for more people to expose GDB to GCC > 4 so that all the other problems above and beyond gdb_byte can be > identified and fixed. > > Yup, but GCC got a bit bloated and takes a long time too compile on my > poor old boxes. > Yep, I am working on that in my spare time. We have internal daily builds of GCC 4.0 which I am using to build and test GDB. I have one patch outstanding that need to be approved for commit, its a patch for GDBserver (there is a missing header file and wrong types). Can anyone look into that please? SUB: " [RFC] GDBserver compiler warnings patch" gdbpatches@ pinged on June 6th 05. What I can also do is, once a week/while post test results for gdb+gcc4.0 to gdb-testers@. Is this useful? Thanks Manjo