From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8696 invoked by alias); 26 May 2004 22:13:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8428 invoked from network); 26 May 2004 22:13:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO e33.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.131) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 26 May 2004 22:13:12 -0000 Received: from westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.11]) by e33.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i4QMD5wc604890; Wed, 26 May 2004 18:13:05 -0400 Received: from austin.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id i4QMD4Y4358996; Wed, 26 May 2004 16:13:04 -0600 Received: from lazy.austin.ibm.com (lazy.austin.ibm.com [9.53.94.97]) by austin.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i4QMD3tM078706; Wed, 26 May 2004 17:13:03 -0500 Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 22:13:00 -0000 From: Manoj Iyer X-X-Sender: manjo@lazy To: Randolph Chung cc: Andrew Cagney , Joel Brobecker , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB 6.1.1 2004-05-21-gmt In-Reply-To: <20040525222803.GQ7207@tausq.org> Message-ID: References: <40B3B907.2030401@gnu.org> <20040525214720.GK10684@gnat.com> <20040525215332.GM7207@tausq.org> <40B3C714.6030605@gnu.org> <20040525222803.GQ7207@tausq.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg00184.txt.bz2 I have similar issues with GDB 6.1 wrt ppc64, there are many changes in mainline that I would like to have in 6.1, so my question is... When will 6.2 be released? -- Manoj On Tue, 25 May 2004, Randolph Chung wrote: > > There seem to be a significant number of fixes even without this - > > basics such as value return and backtraces. > > > > As for the arch and other core changes, they can wait until 6.2. > > ok... it's just that the gdbarch change will fix MANY problems in the > testsuite. :) > > what is the process for getting patches into 6.1? Are they resubmitted > one-by-one, or do i do a wholesale diff of hppa-specific files? There > are about 30 patches from me that has gone into CVS since 6.1. > > thanks > randolph > -- > Randolph Chung > Debian GNU/Linux Developer, hppa/ia64 ports > http://www.tausq.org/ >