From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4261 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 2003 21:50:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4154 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2003 21:50:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bos-gate4.raytheon.com) (199.46.198.233) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Dec 2003 21:50:35 -0000 Received: from ds02e00.directory.ray.com (ds02e00.directory.ray.com [147.25.130.245]) by bos-gate4.raytheon.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hB3Lo2NV001890; Wed, 3 Dec 2003 16:50:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from ds02e00.directory.ray.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ds02e00.directory.ray.com (8.12.10/8.12.1) with ESMTP id hB3LnloT006666; Wed, 3 Dec 2003 21:50:01 GMT Received: Received: from electra.rsc.raytheon.com (electra.RSC.RAYTHEON.COM [147.19.81.176]) by ds02e00.directory.ray.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hB3Lngmk006626 sender sawitt@zeus.rsc.raytheon.com; Wed, 3 Dec 2003 21:49:42 GMT Received: from [147.19.81.175] (helo=zeus.rsc.raytheon.com ident=mail) by electra.rsc.raytheon.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AResP-00089n-00; Wed, 03 Dec 2003 13:49:41 -0800 Received: from sawitt (helo=localhost) by zeus.rsc.raytheon.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AResP-0005bS-00; Wed, 03 Dec 2003 13:49:41 -0800 Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 21:50:00 -0000 From: "Stephen A. Witt" X-X-Sender: sawitt@zeus.rsc.raytheon.com To: Daniel Jacobowitz cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Remote Debugging on IXDP425 In-Reply-To: <20031203212910.GB2649@nevyn.them.org> Message-ID: References: <20031203212910.GB2649@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00069.txt.bz2 On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 11:17:18AM -0800, Stephen A. Witt wrote: > > Thanks very much for the response, very dumb mistake on my part. I had > > built a gdb with an arm-linux target, but I inadvertantly used the normal > > i386 gdb when I first tried this. Using the arm-linux gdb that I had > > built, with the information you provided, I found that the breakpoint > > instruction being sent was 0x01009fef. The correct bp inst for an IXP425 > > (a big-endian CPU) is 0xef9f0001. So I modified the breakpoint instruction > > value in gdb to 0xef9f0001 and breakpoints work now. > > This is a GDB bug fixed in more recent versions of GDB. Thanks for the response. Browsing gdb cvs I see the big endian break inst. mod. I'll get the latest from cvs and see what happens. Thanks...