From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24139 invoked by alias); 2 Feb 2003 15:33:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24131 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2003 15:33:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dberlin.org) (69.3.5.6) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 2 Feb 2003 15:33:30 -0000 Received: from [192.168.1.2] (HELO dberlin.org) by dberlin.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.5) with ESMTP-TLS id 2610819; Sun, 02 Feb 2003 10:33:29 -0500 Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2003 15:33:00 -0000 From: Daniel Berlin To: Daniel Jacobowitz cc: Andrew Cagney , Mark Kettenis , "" Subject: Re: RFC: Variables in blocks of registers In-Reply-To: <20030201171001.GB29662@nevyn.them.org> Message-ID: References: <200302011448.h11EmCkP001176@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <3E3BEC50.9040104@redhat.com> <20030201171001.GB29662@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00024.txt.bz2 > > However, right now GCC doesn't generate this. Probably because it > would kill us. If I have any mental energy left after location lists, > I may implement support for DW_OP_piece. Err, the location list patch does. Even without it, you can get them in one specific case (If you have CONCAT's in RTL). So GCC *does* generate it, right now. CONCATS only pop up when we are using complex numbers, as far as a quick grep of the gcc code shows. --Dan