From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15869 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2004 15:27:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15747 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2004 15:27:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO deadlock.et.tudelft.nl) (130.161.36.93) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Jan 2004 15:27:04 -0000 Received: from daniel (helo=localhost) by deadlock.et.tudelft.nl with local-esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AlV6l-0007fF-00; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:26:31 +0100 Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:27:00 -0000 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dani=EBl_Mantione?= To: Daniel Jacobowitz cc: Ian Lance Taylor , Subject: Re: Stabs: constant string, constant boolean In-Reply-To: <20040127141331.GA22724@nevyn.them.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00318.txt.bz2 On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > If you're working on new code, why not use dwarf2 instead? Does dwarf2 support passing these things to gdb then? I could start on dwarf2 support in compiler, it's on the roadmap, and if it would give us better support its even a good idea (but it doesn't help that our gdb expert left the project). On the other hand we're approaching 2.0, and that's the reason I'm working = on the stabs code; sort out issues with it. Dani=EBl