From: Mike Mueller <mmueller@cs.uri.edu>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: obsoleting annotate level 2
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 19:53:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302041450480.5742-100000@andromeda.cs.uri.edu> (raw)
Jim Blandy wrote:
> The plan has been, for a very long time, to remove all
> annotations. I proposed keeping level one annotations. Here was
> my rationale:
> Level one annotations are implemented by code at two or three
> points in GDB. They're not a big deal to maintain. And they're
> what current releases of Emacs use.
> Level two annotations are implemented by (I think) around eighty
> different bits of code, scattered throughout GDB.
> Thus, while level one annotations are only a small maintenance
> burden, level two annotations are. Even if Emacs had been using
> level two annotations for years, we would be trying to get rid of
> them.
Jim,
Our only concern is that annotate 2 is the basis of our
application. Our request is that the removal of annotate 2 is done
when MI is stable and is successfully used by at least one
application. Until MI has reached that point, our application will
be forced to depend on annotate 2.
Note that we are not arguing to keep annotate 2 around forever. Our
hope is simply that annotate 2 will stay around until MI reaches a
mature and stable state.
Thanks,
Mike
next reply other threads:[~2003-02-04 19:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-04 19:53 Mike Mueller [this message]
2003-02-05 6:57 ` Jim Blandy
2003-02-05 20:04 ` Bob Rossi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-04 12:44 Bob Rossi
2003-02-04 15:49 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-02-04 16:12 ` Peter Kovacs
2003-02-04 16:30 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-02-04 16:37 ` Bob Rossi
2003-02-04 17:10 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-02-04 19:48 ` Jim Blandy
2003-02-04 21:22 ` Nick Roberts
2003-02-04 23:01 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-02-04 16:41 ` Peter Kovacs
2003-02-04 16:46 ` Peter Kovacs
2003-02-04 17:16 ` Elena Zannoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0302041450480.5742-100000@andromeda.cs.uri.edu \
--to=mmueller@cs.uri.edu \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox