From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30184 invoked by alias); 19 Sep 2002 20:19:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30175 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2002 20:19:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO valrhona.uglyboxes.com) (64.1.192.220) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Sep 2002 20:19:30 -0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (IDENT:PL4sfZ++PNpb99ueZ0N6jVCjEEhZVMC2@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by valrhona.uglyboxes.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8JKM6f01717; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 13:22:06 -0700 Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 13:19:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz X-X-Sender: keiths@valrhona.uglyboxes.com To: Kevin Buettner cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: branching In-Reply-To: <1020919201141.ZM22342@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00287.txt.bz2 On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Kevin Buettner wrote: > Do you create a new tag for each merge? Yes: kseitz_interps-20020829-merge (revision: 1.69) kseitz_interps-20020809-merge (revision: 1.66) kseitz_interps-20020722-merge (revision: 1.65) kseitz_interps-20020619-merge (revision: 1.61) kseitz_interps-20020528-branch (branch: 1.59.4) kseitz_interps-20020528-branchpoint (revision: 1.59) > Do you remove old tags that are no longer useful? Can this be done? I've never heard of anyone removing a tag. Hmm, indeed: $ cvs rtag --help [snip] -d Delete the given tag. [snip] Wow. I guess I should get rid of the older tags (or use the -F option to move a tag). Keith