From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29808 invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2002 18:50:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29800 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2002 18:50:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO valrhona.uglyboxes.com) (64.1.192.220) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Sep 2002 18:50:39 -0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (IDENT:1+jSxqBgAuRJGwy6Mb4GnNGJWn2y2nF8@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by valrhona.uglyboxes.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8IIr6m03324; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 11:53:11 -0700 Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 11:50:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz X-X-Sender: keiths@valrhona.uglyboxes.com To: Prashant Deva cc: gdb Subject: Re: MI interface In-Reply-To: <009301c25f43$aa38c550$db698aca@homecomp> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00263.txt.bz2 On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Prashant Deva wrote: > Does that mean that all people developing a gui right now should switch to > gdb v5.1.1? I don't see how 5.1.1 would help. In terms of MI, 5.1 and 5.2 and nearly identical. All versions of MI, including 5.x and cvs head suffer from this "problem". Keith