From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25061 invoked by alias); 11 Sep 2002 19:33:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25054 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2002 19:33:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.cdt.org) (206.112.85.61) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Sep 2002 19:33:07 -0000 Received: from www.dberlin.org (pool-151-200-240-35.res.east.verizon.net [151.200.240.35]) by mail.cdt.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89EAC49006A; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:11:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: by www.dberlin.org (Postfix, from userid 503) id 0AD3318A1930; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:33:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www.dberlin.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9272218A18D1; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:33:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 12:33:00 -0000 From: Daniel Berlin To: David Carlton Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb Subject: Re: struct environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT_PINE version=2.40-cvs X-Spam-Level: X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00106.txt.bz2 On 11 Sep 2002, David Carlton wrote: > On Tue, 10 Sep 2002 20:31:32 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz said: > > > I believe the SYMBOL_ALIASES stuff has all died; it was never in a > > standard FSF GCC, just in a Cygnus product. We'll need to handle > > something along these lines in the fortold day of wonders, when we > > actually have thought of something clever to do when debugging > > inlined functions; but for now I doubt anyone would miss this. > > Thanks for the pointer: > says > something similar, and asks for permission to delete it (together with > SYMBOL_RANGES). But I guess it was never deleted (and the > LOC_COMPUTED stuff that that message refers to hasn't yet been > implemented). Implemented yes, but i've not time to make the requested minor changes necessary to get approval. Law school and all that jazz. Feel free to do so if you like, the patches/what is necessary is on gdb-patches. Shouldn't take but a day. > > For now, I'll just leave out that part of the code (or, better, > include it but #if 0 it out and add an explanatory comment). > > David Carlton > carlton@math.stanford.edu > >