From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31065 invoked by alias); 11 Sep 2002 03:12:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31058 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2002 03:12:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.250) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Sep 2002 03:12:02 -0000 Received: from Chrestomanci [209.42.199.133] by intrex.net with ESMTP (SMTPD32-5.05) id A47DC9BF0050; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 23:11:57 -0400 Received: from faheem (helo=localhost) by Chrestomanci with local-esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17oxsm-000423-00; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 23:09:36 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 20:12:00 -0000 From: Faheem Mitha X-X-Sender: faheem@Chrestomanci To: Jim Blandy cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: setfault calling functions within gdb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Declude-Sender: faheem@email.unc.edu [209.42.199.133] X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00093.txt.bz2 On 10 Sep 2002, Jim Blandy wrote: > > I don't see anything obviously wrong with what you're doing (although > someone is certain to pop up and correct me). Could you file this as > a bug report at http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/, so it won't get > lost? I've sent it to the Debian bug tracking system, against gdb. Is that Ok? One reason for doing so is because it is a version of gdb that is from cvs, so is presumably unique to Debian. Also, I prefer the Debian interface. :-) I suppose I can send a copy to http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/ if you think that is necessary. Faheem.