From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27397 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2002 22:52:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27390 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2002 22:52:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO valrhona.uglyboxes.com) (64.1.192.220) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 Aug 2002 22:52:08 -0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (IDENT:4ijA3TlYLjXdfhjnJ6BeJi0czZxlVGQ4@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by valrhona.uglyboxes.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7CMsZB12276; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 15:54:41 -0700 Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 15:52:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz X-X-Sender: keiths@valrhona.uglyboxes.com To: Andrew Cagney cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [Interpeters] "set interpreter" useful? In-Reply-To: <3D583AE9.7020502@ges.redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00115.txt.bz2 > Yes (how can you rip out something that was never fully > approved/committed? :-) :-) > Sounds like you've come up with a bit of doco that should go with > -interpreter-exec, explaining why ``-interpreter-set'' would be a bad > move :-) Yup, I'll comment on that. Thanks for the comment. Now that this headache is over with (gee, and I almost got it working really well!), I'm gonna finish up some documentation changes and start submitting patches for review... Stay tuned! Keith