From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24643 invoked by alias); 6 Apr 2002 19:57:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24635 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2002 19:56:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dberlin.org) (64.246.6.106) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Apr 2002 19:56:58 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by dberlin.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g36Jurm27146; Sat, 6 Apr 2002 14:56:54 -0500 Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2002 11:57:00 -0000 From: Daniel Berlin To: Gianni Mariani cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , Jim Blandy , , Benjamin Kosnik Subject: Re: C++ nested classes, namespaces, structs, and compound statements In-Reply-To: <3CAF2FBA.5040000@mariani.ws> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00086.txt.bz2 On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Gianni Mariani wrote: > > As a complete digression: > > Although this problem might need to be solved in the fashion presented > here, I can't help but think we're trying to solve the wrong problem. > > Much of what is discussed here is language and compiler specific. No, it's not. It's language specific. It's compiler independent. --Dan