Re: gdb-5.x and step over inline functions

Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-02-24T16:40:12Z

On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 03:14:00PM +0200, Iso-H wrote:
>
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> >
> > On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Iso-H wrote:
> >
> > > Is there any way to step over inline functions
> > > when using gdb >= 5.1 ? Some (commandline or other)option
> > > perhaps?
> >
> > Doesn't `until' do that? That is, given that line 123 calls an inline
> > function, and line 124 is the one after the inline function returns, you
> > should be able to say "until 124" and get what you want. Does that work?
>
> It isn't same; for example if I want to say: "list f_MyFunction"
> and if there is (==beginning of "f_MyFunction") some objects
> which have inline constructors I get list of those constructor(s)
> NOT list of "f_MyFunction" as I expected/wanted. Besides,
> I have to check what is the line number from source code by editor
> because gdb can't show that line to me.
>
> Same goes with "next"; if I set breakpoint: "b f_MyFunction"
> I don't get what I want, because I end up to inside of those
> f*king inline constructor(s) again when breakpoint is reached!
>
> All this works with gdb-5.0, so gdb-5.1.x behaves
> differently here...

Could you provide a small testcase, with source and a compile
commandline? By small I also mean including no system headers. I'll
try to see what has changed.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer