From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28864 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2002 04:03:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28857 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2002 04:03:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.83.203) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Aug 2002 04:03:15 -0000 Received: from makita.cygnus.com (makita.sfbay.redhat.com [192.168.30.83]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA11006; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 21:02:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (keiths@localhost) by makita.cygnus.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.6.4) with ESMTP id VAA23857; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 21:03:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: makita.cygnus.com: keiths owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 21:03:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz X-X-Sender: To: Mo DeJong cc: Subject: Re: Proposed mod for stack-select-frame MI command In-Reply-To: <20020801191811.4144cc0c.supermo@bayarea.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Mo DeJong wrote: > You would also need to assume that the client would not use the > frame, up, down and other cli methods via the MI. If they did, the > local stack level integer that the client held would be wrong. That's not really true anymore. It is right now on cvs HEAD, but in my MI branch, the MI client would get a frame-level-changed event when the user used the "up", "down", and "frame" commands from the cli (-interpreter-exec). FWIW, I don't think it's necessary, but I wouldn't object to having this... Keith