From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28717 invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2002 18:00:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28576 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2002 18:00:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.83.203) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Jun 2002 18:00:10 -0000 Received: from makita.cygnus.com (makita.sfbay.redhat.com [192.168.30.83]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA04771 for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 11:00:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (keiths@localhost) by makita.cygnus.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.6.4) with ESMTP id LAA07131 for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 11:00:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: makita.cygnus.com: keiths owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 11:00:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz X-X-Sender: To: Subject: [RFC] Breakpoint events: revisited Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00137.txt.bz2 Hi, Ok, I hate to beat a dead horse, BUT... A long time ago, I proposed eradicating UI notification for internal breakpoints. It was argued at the time that they should be available to UI writers wishing to expose these things to some class of users. Fair enough. Well, while working on converting MI over to use events instead of hooks, I noticed that GDB currently only notifies the UI about some internal breakpoints, not all of them. So (beat, beat): Do we still want to expose _all_ internal breakpoints to UIs via breakpoint events, or just some of them? Which ones? I have a patch which adds _all_ of them, and removes the stupid creation event from mention (removing the FIXME at the same time). Keith