From: Michael Veksler <VEKSLER@il.ibm.com>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: GDB unusable on AIX and lucky to work on HP-UX (PR1170)
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:21:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <OFDB42FE2E.64790302-ONC2256F18.002BE1F7-C2256F18.00391856@il.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF4921924F.BC213F71-ONC2256F15.0035B14C-C2256F15.003A1905@il.ibm.com>
This is a bug long overdue, and makes C++ debugging on AIX impossible.
I could reproduce it for simple C code:
/* compile with gcc -g -S */
int get_int1() { const int zero= 0; return zero; }
int get_int2() { const int zero= 0; return zero; }
int main() { return 0; }
If you reorder get_int1 and get_int2 in the ASM file gdb will crash.
(/bin/as is allowed to do so, and it does reorder in big test cases).
This reordering works fine when compiled with gcc -gstabs on Linux.
It seems to be triggered by the combination of stabs and COFF. Since
HP-UX seems to be COFF based I suspect that HP-UX is also affected.
Can someone confirm this?
I seek for advice on how to correctly fix for this.
There are 3 ways:
1. Make gdb behave well when it reads debug info in a "wrong" order.
Any advice on this is welcome.
2. Change gcc to emit =k-{n} (e.g. =k-1) for all instances of constant
built-in type (instead of only once per type).
This is the patch this PR mentions, but David Edelsohn objects
because he thinks it is the wrong way to fix it.
If =k-{n} is required to repeat by stabs format, then it means that
the correct fix *is*
in gcc and should resemble my patch.
3. Change gcc to avoid =k-{n} format altogether in these cases.
I think that solution 1 is the correct one. I looked at xlC output and
came to realize that xlC may trigger the same bug in gdb (if gdb
understood xlC's C++).
Michael
Veksler/Haifa/IBM
@IBMIL To
Sent by: gdb@sources.redhat.com
gdb-owner@sources cc
.redhat.com
Subject
PR1170: wrong assumption on stab =
20/09/2004 13:34 crash
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gdb&pr=1170
1. First I'll describe how to reproduce (will probably
crash on other stab+coff systems)
2. Later I'll explain why this happens.
3. Then I'll ask how this should be fixed.
---- How to reproduce ----
On AIX, (maybe on other systems) the folding will crash
gdb (5.3, and as I remember, 6.0 and later):
// g++ -g
struct X { static const int firstInt = 0; };
struct Y { static const int secondInt = 0; };
int main() { }
Move the stabstring about 'firstInt' till after the
stabstring about 'main' (something that /bin/as and
/bin/ld are allowed to do).
Now, in gdb do either:
'ptype Y', or 'break main'
At this point you should get:
gdbtypes.c:515: gdb-internal-error: make_cv_type: Assertion `TYPE_OBJFILE
(*typeptr) == TYPE_OBJFILE (type) || TYPE_STUB (*typeptr)' failed.
An internal GDB error was detected. This .......
---- What causes the crash ----
'firstInt' is assigned a new type-id (13) which is a typedef
of the build in 'int':
X:Tt12=s1firstInt:/213=k-1:........
^^ ^^^
type-id built-in type (1 == int).
'secondInt' reuses the same type-id:
Y:Tt21=s1secondInt:/213:....
^^
type-id
Now /bin/as or /bin/ld move firstInt stabstring much
after secondInt.
GDB reads the symbols in order:
1. secondInt:/213, gdb puts a new type-id = 13 in a symbol table.
This is an incomplete type.
2. firstInt:/213=k-1, oops this is not an incomplete type but
a const built-in type. An assertion in make_cv_type fails.
A comment preceding this assertion reads:
/* Objfile is per-core-type. This const-qualified type had best
belong to the same objfile as the type it is qualifying, unless
we are overwriting a stub type, in which case the safest thing
to do is to copy the core type into the new objfile. */
---- How to fix ----
Removing the assertion does not resolve the core issue.
Is it possible to update change type information when GDB
learns more about the type? It must be the case for:
struct A ;
struct A { /* some stuff */ };
Why is it not the case for 'static const int firstInt=0' ?
Is there something deep in the infrastructure that prevents
this? Is it because of late addition of c-v (const/volatile)?
Is it a bug in gcc - which should emit "13=k-1" every time
instead of plain "13" (it should not loose the const qualifier).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-23 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-20 10:32 PR1170: wrong assumption on stab = crash Michael Veksler
2004-09-23 10:21 ` Michael Veksler [this message]
2004-09-23 15:45 ` GDB unusable on AIX and lucky to work on HP-UX (PR1170) Joel Brobecker
2004-09-23 16:23 ` Michael Veksler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=OFDB42FE2E.64790302-ONC2256F18.002BE1F7-C2256F18.00391856@il.ibm.com \
--to=veksler@il.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox