From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18167 invoked by alias); 9 Feb 2005 14:57:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17931 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2005 14:57:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM) (217.40.213.68) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 9 Feb 2005 14:57:27 -0000 Received: from mace ([192.168.1.25]) by NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 9 Feb 2005 14:57:26 +0000 From: "Dave Korn" To: "'Bob Rossi'" , "'Andrew Cagney'" Cc: Subject: RE: gdb 6.4 Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 14:59:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <20050209140252.GA25945@white> Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Feb 2005 14:57:26.0057 (UTC) FILETIME=[AAFF0190:01C50EB7] X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00061.txt.bz2 > -----Original Message----- > From: gdb-owner On Behalf Of Bob Rossi > Sent: 09 February 2005 14:03 > To: Andrew Cagney > Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com > Subject: Re: gdb 6.4 > > > I'll be spending the next week ensuring that the patch backlog is > > drained (I've 260 gdb-patches@ and 80 gdb@ e-mails to clear). > > Maybe faster release's is the answer to faster patch review. > > Bob Rossi I don't see how that could be possible. More frequent releases == more time spent packaging them == less time available to spend reviewing patches == slower progress on the code, doesn't it? cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today....