From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-20252-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 24615 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2004 18:04:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 24423 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2004 18:03:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM) (217.40.111.177)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 24 Nov 2004 18:03:13 -0000
Received: from mace ([192.168.1.25]) by NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
	 Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:01:52 +0000
From: "Dave Korn" <dk@artimi.com>
To: <ramana.radhakrishnan@codito.com>,
	<devnull@kma.eu.org>
Cc: <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: RE: Struct fields printed in a strange way
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 17:26:00 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <32856.210.18.132.234.1101319515.squirrel@webmail.codito.com>
Message-ID: <NUTMEGaVupK0OVYqSdv000000a3@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Nov 2004 18:01:52.0281 (UTC) FILETIME=[AD2C0890:01C4D24F]
X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00245.txt.bz2

> -----Original Message-----
> From: gdb-owner On Behalf Of Ramana Radhakrishnan
> Sent: 24 November 2004 18:05

> > gdb seems slightly confused when the name of a struct field is
> > suffixed with "__0".
> >
> > $ cat foo.c
> > struct foo { double x__0, y__0, z__1; } bar;
> >
> > int main(void) { return 0; }
> >
> > $ gcc-3.3.2 -Wall -ansi -pedantic -g3 foo.c
> 
> I was able to repeat this with
> 
> [ramana@numenor gdb]$ gcc -v

> gcc version 3.3.2 20031022 (Red Hat Linux 3.3.2-1)
> 
> and
> 
> 
> GNU gdb 6.3.50_2004-11-23-cvs


  Also confirmed on cygwin with "gcc (GCC) 3.3.3 (cygwin special)" and 
"GNU gdb 2003-09-20-cvs (cygwin-special)"

  So it's a fairly longstanding bug.

> > (gdb) show language
> > The current source language is "auto; currently c".
> >
> > Why is x__0 changed to ::x(void)? Is the "__0" suffix 
> reserved in gdb?
> 
> 
> This appears to be due to the way in which the structs are handled in
> c-valprint.c . The demangler gets called here because the function
> c_val_print prints the structure fields using the printer from the c++
> language implementation. Should there not be a C equivalent for this ?
> This btw is from yesterday's CVS sources.

  That's definitely bad logic.  I had noticed that even if you explicitly
say "set lang c", it _still_ tries to demangle the name.  Anyone going to
file a bugzilla then?

    cheers, 
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....