From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15087 invoked by alias); 21 Jul 2004 19:15:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15013 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2004 19:15:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO intranet.tidalnetworks.net) (67.114.153.34) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 21 Jul 2004 19:15:33 -0000 Received: from xinanpc ([172.16.0.111]) (authenticated bits=0) by intranet.tidalnetworks.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i6LJGMAB016416 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:16:23 -0700 From: "Xinan Tang" To: Subject: "igen vs. cgen?" Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 20:24:00 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-reply-to: X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg00268.txt.bz2 Hi When I search the gdb mailing list for adding a new simulator, two approaches were mentioned: igen vs. cgen. Now igen (psim) was included within gdb, is there any consensus which one should be used within gdb for adding a new simulator? Thanks --Xinan