From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-11768-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 15662 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2003 18:14:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 15650 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2003 18:14:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO fw1.coware.com) (208.46.221.194)
  by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 8 Jan 2003 18:14:32 -0000
Received: from CoWare.com (coware1 [192.168.1.102])
	by fw1.coware.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.4) with ESMTP id h08IELe16111;
	Wed, 8 Jan 2003 10:14:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gleekxp (dhcp209.coware.com [192.168.1.209])
	by CoWare.com (8.11.1/8.11.4) with SMTP id h08IELh02834;
	Wed, 8 Jan 2003 10:14:21 -0800 (PST)
From: "Sunil Alankar" <sunil.alankar@coware.com>
To: "Daniel Jacobowitz" <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: RE: GDB 5.2/5.3 breakpoint bug
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 18:14:00 -0000
Message-ID: <IMEGIEBLGLIOEGOLAFIEMEOJCEAA.sunil.alankar@coware.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
In-Reply-To: <20030108173042.GA22279@nevyn.them.org>
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00083.txt.bz2

Yes. GDB 5.1 sets break point on func() with the same binary/compiler. 5.2
and 5.3 also work on Linux but have problems on Solaris.

--Sunil

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Jacobowitz [mailto:drow@mvista.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 9:31 AM
To: Sunil Alankar
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: GDB 5.2/5.3 breakpoint bug


On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 03:07:04PM -0800, Sunil Alankar wrote:
> //-------------------------------------------------------------
> #include <systemc.h>
>
> SC_MODULE(top)
> {
>  public:
>
>     sc_in_clk iclk;
>
>     void func()
>         {
>             printf (".");
>         }
>
>     SC_CTOR(top)
>         {
>             SC_METHOD(func);
>             sensitive_pos << iclk;
>             dont_initialize();
>         }
> };


Func is an inline method.  Does gdb 5.1 really set a breakpoint on it?
Using the exact same binary and compiler?  I find that pretty
surprising, since there is no symbol for it anywhere; GDB's support for
inline methods is pretty lousy right now.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer