From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1022 invoked by alias); 2 Feb 2002 20:14:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 990 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2002 20:14:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.sandvine.com) (209.167.74.226) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Feb 2002 20:14:00 -0000 Received: by mail.sandvine.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Sat, 2 Feb 2002 15:13:55 -0500 Message-ID: From: Don Bowman To: 'Stan Shebs' , Don Bowman Cc: 'Greg McGary' , 'Daniel Jacobowitz' , gdb@sources.redhat.com, echristo@redhat.com Subject: RE: MIPS stack tracing Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2002 12:14:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00057.txt.bz2 Stan Shebs wrote: > Don Bowman wrote: > > > > I've been debugging through gdb for a day or so now, I think > > I'm on to something. It appears that find_proc_desc is switching > > to the heuristic approach even though I have a symbol table. > > That's a bug for sure. The heuristic approach is only supposed > to be used for tracing through frames with no debug info. > > Stan > Can you confirm that if there is no .stabs, but symbols are present, that it shouldn't use the heuristic approach? It appears that if all my objects are built with at least -g1 then it works. --don