From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24329 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2002 12:55:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24280 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2002 12:55:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO wiggum.nawcad.navy.mil) (192.58.199.176) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Nov 2002 12:55:48 -0000 Received: by wiggum.nawcad.navy.mil; id HAA11993; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 07:55:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from neim02.nawcad.navy.mil(140.229.37.205) by wiggum.nawcad.navy.mil via smap (V4.2) id xma011935; Mon, 18 Nov 02 07:55:46 -0500 Received: by neim02.nawcad.navy.mil with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 07:55:45 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Smith, Jonathan C5" To: "'Andrew Cagney'" , "Smith, Jonathan C5" Cc: "'gdb@sources.redhat.com'" Subject: RE: PR 207, 662 Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 04:55:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00192.txt.bz2 Using the same definitions of CC and CXX on the gdb nightly tarball dated today (20021118), the grep returned nothing (no results) with return value of 1. Jonathan Smith -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Cagney [mailto:ac131313@redhat.com] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 8:18 PM To: Smith, Jonathan C5 Cc: 'gdb@sources.redhat.com' Subject: Re: PR 207, 662 > On SGI 6.5: > It is still broken when built with GCC 3.2. > Setting the enviroment variable 'CC' to CC, the build breaks with > 'configure: error: Could not find a term library' in '.../gdb'. I just re-did a build on an IRIX 6.5 system using the 5.3 branch sources I had: CC=/bin/cc CXX=/bin/CC and configured with --disable-nls. Looking in gdb/config.status, configure found: cagney@holodeck$ grep term config.status s%@TERM_LIB@%-ltermlib%g ${ac_dA}HAVE_TERM_H${ac_dB}HAVE_TERM_H${ac_dC}1${ac_dD} ${ac_dA}HAVE_TERMIO_H${ac_dB}HAVE_TERMIO_H${ac_dC}1${ac_dD} ${ac_dA}HAVE_TERMIOS_H${ac_dB}HAVE_TERMIOS_H${ac_dC}1${ac_dD} Is any of this on your system? Andrew > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Cagney [mailto:ac131313@redhat.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:00 PM > To: Smith, Jonathan C5 > Cc: 'gdb@sources.redhat.com' > Subject: Re: PR 207, 662 > > > >> Snapshot from 20020403, 5.2.0, 5.2.1. >> >> I haven't taken a snapshot from the 5.3 branch as it takes a few hours to >> transfer to the stand-alone network. I shall do that tonight. Is there a >> reason to expect this fixed in the latest snapshot when its been a problem >> for a long time (PR 207 is dated Tue Sep 04 09:18:01 PDT 2001) and I don't >> see any resolution information in the PRs. > > > A month or so back MichaelS KevinB and I gave the MIPS on IRIX stuff a > ``good talking too', n32, n64 and o32 now work a lot better. It was all > on 6.5 with the IRIX compiler, from memory 207 refers to 5.x. > > Andrew > >