From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13973 invoked by alias); 8 Jul 2004 15:17:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13964 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2004 15:17:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dberlin.org) (69.3.5.6) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2004 15:17:46 -0000 Received: from [192.168.1.7] (account dberlin HELO [192.168.1.7]) by dberlin.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b6) with ESMTP-TLS id 7063074; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 11:17:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20040708151058.GA21388@nevyn.them.org> References: <40ED5AB8.9060304@gnu.org> <745BC5DA-D0EE-11D8-9149-000A95DA505C@dberlin.org> <40ED6302.3020704@gnu.org> <20040708151058.GA21388@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andrew Cagney , gdb@sources.redhat.com, Christopher Faylor From: Daniel Berlin Subject: Re: bugzilla Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 15:17:00 -0000 To: Daniel Jacobowitz X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg00073.txt.bz2 >> Why is a renumbering needed? It's our database can't we do what we >> like? :-) > > GNATS numbers bugs independently per product; Bugzilla doesn't. > There's one bugzilla installation on sources.redhat.com already, and > it's shared with binutils and glibc. > > Um, I suppose we could set up a third copy of Bugzilla on that machine. > I don't know what the issues with that would be but presumably Daniel > Berlin does. > The only real problem with doing that is the pain-in-the-assness of updating three bugzilla installations every year or so when i merge new stable bugzilla code. However, if that's what you guys want, ....