RE: Multiexec MI broke MI compatibility?

Vladimir Prus
2010-06-05T05:16:20Z

Marc Khouzam wrote:

>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Frederic Riss [mailto:frederic.riss@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 4:12 AM
>> To: Marc Khouzam
>> Cc: Vladimir Prus; gdb@sources.redhat.com
>> Subject: Re: Multiexec MI broke MI compatibility?
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> On 13 April 2010 22:33, Marc Khouzam
>> <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com> wrote:
>> >>> 797,748 10-list-thread-groups i1
>> >>> 797,748 10^error,msg="invalid group id 'i1'"
>> <-------------- when we ask for the same is, GDB rejects it
>> >>> 797,749 (gdb)
>> >>
>> >> This sounds like a bug indeed. Can you file an issue?
>> >
>> > I'm hoping Frederic can do that since he knows the proper details.
>>
>> Done here:
>> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11499
>
> As there are discussions for an earlier release of 7.2,
> I wanted to mention this regression.
> I think this is something that should be fixed before 7.2.

Yes, working on that now.

>
>> This leaves the question of whether the thread-group-created
>> notification name change was appropriate (From a backward
>> compatibility POV, not from a pure 'it makes sense' angle).
>
> As for this, is the plan to keep the change or to revert?

The plan is to keep the change, sorry.

- Volodya